IZW - Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research |
Current HighlightsArtificial bat roosts could re-seed the tropics
|
|
|
|
Animals generally avoid inbreeding because it is genetically hazardous. They can either do this by moving away from home or, like humans, by learning who their relatives are and not mating with them. In most mammals, the young males move away and the females stay, resulting in a low level of inbreeding. But why is it the males that move away, given that the females invest much more in raising their offspring and should therefore have a greater interest in avoiding inbreeding?
Research on spotted hyenas published in Nature this week by an international team of scientists from the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) in Berlin, Germany, and the University of Sheffield, UK, now shows that the reason most males move from their natal group is because of female mate-choice - the rules females use when choosing which of many male group members will sire their offspring. Young females prefer to mate with "new arrivals" in a group - males born into the group or males that immigrated into the group after the female was born - because by doing so they avoid breeding with their father and their older brothers. Females are unlikely to know who their father is because - like most male mammals - male hyenas do not contribute to the rearing of their offspring and females mate promiscuously.
Older females also apply this rule and in addition prefer males that have built friendly relationships with them for several years. These age-related mate preferences of females (assortative mating) influence where males choose to initiate their reproductive careers because ultimately they determine a male’s reproductive success. The results of this study demonstrate that males mostly start their reproductive careers in groups with the highest number of young females and that the males that choose groups containing the highest number of young females sire the highest number of offspring in the long term. "Long-lived males that selected the correct group at the start of their reproductive career had access to a high number of females for many years and sired far more offspring than other males", says Dr Oliver Höner from the IZW. Most males disperse because a higher number of young females usually occurs elsewhere, rather than in the group in which the male was raised. Dr Höner adds: "The results of the study were only possible because we could monitor the decision by males on where to start their reproductive career in all eight resident hyena groups on the floor of the Ngorongoro Crater and we could genetically determine paternity for most offspring produced in a 10-year monitoring period."
This is the first time it has been shown in a mammalian species that the males that respond best to female mate preferences and as a result in most cases move from their natal group do pass on more of their genes to future generations, and that the system is driven by females using very simple rules, which are enough to prevent them from mating incestuously.

Vampire bats that live in Latin America have switched to blood meals from cattle instead of from rainforest mammals, ecological physiologists from the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, the Freie Universität Berlin, the Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and the University of Aberdeen report in the Journal of Comparative Physiology B online. They say that the conversion of rainforests ecosystems into livestock producing farmland resulted in the expansion of vampire bat populations in Latin America.
Farmers are observing vampire bats satisfying their need for blood by attacking cattle instead of wild mammals. To document this change in behaviour, Dr Christian Voigt and colleagues analysed the stable carbon isotope ratio of exhaled CO2 in vampire bats. They fed captive vampires blood that was labelled with the stable (non-radioactive) isotope carbon-13 and then monitored the time period between the blood meal and the appearance of labelled carbon atoms in the exhaled breath. "Vampire bats used the freshly ingested blood very fast to fuel their metabolism; after less than an hour the stable carbon isotope signature of the vampires’ exhaled breath was similar to that of their latest diet" Dr Voigt states.
Then the researchers collected breath of free-ranging vampire bats in Costa Rica and analysed its stable carbon isotope signature. "The potential victims of vampires in Costa Rica are either cattle or rainforest mammals such as tapirs and peccaries. These two groups of animals feed on isotopically distinct plants which are grasses in the case of cattle and herbs or shrubs in the case of rainforest mammals. Therefore, we expected that the stable carbon isotope signature in bat breath would change according to their diet" Dr Voigt continues. The vampires’ breath clearly indicated that their last blood meal almost always originated from cattle, although rainforest mammals were also present.
The authors argue that the vampire bats do not necessarily prefer cattle blood, but that cattle are much easier to find for vampires than rainforest mammals. Cattle are held fenced-in on open pastures, whereas rainforest mammals roam in dense vegetation. Converting rainforests into pasture has a large impact on many native mammals of Latin America, usually not to the benefit of the original mammal fauna.
Vampire bats live only in Central and South America and weigh 30 - 40 g. Vampires share food among unrelated group members, a behaviour known as reciprocal altruism, which vampire bats have in common with humans.
According to an upcoming study in Functional Ecology, the bat burns sugar faster than any other mammal--and about two or three times faster than humans--but because of its low body fat, the animal risks death if it doesn't eat every 12 hours. The bat is one of the few mammals with a purely sugar diet, making it a promising model organism for studying insulin metabolism and diabetes, say the authors. (Photo: Merlin D. Tuttle, Bat Conservation International)
Pitra C, VazPinto P,
O´Keeffe BWJ, Willows-Munro S, Jansen van Vuuren B, Robinson TJ (2006) DNA-led
rediscovery of the giant sable antelope in Angola. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. (DOI 10.1007/s10344-00-0026-y
Of all the animals to lose, the giant sable antelope might seem be
the most embarrassing. The mammal, which only lives in Angola and has horns
that can grow to 1.5 metres long, was feared extinct. But an international team
of scientists from the Leibniz-Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research in
Berlin, the Universidade
Católica de Angola, the Shikar Club, England, and the University
of Stellenbosch, South Africa have shown that the animal is hardier than anyone
thought, having survived 30 years of civil war and unrest in its native
country. The team examined pictures from camera traps and genetic material from
droppings and compared it with DNA-samples that came from museum specimens.
"Our findings are of great importance for conservation. The giant sable
antelope is not only the national symbol of Angola, it is also a flagship
species for conservation." The giant sable antelope was discovered in 1914
and was last sighted in Angola in 1982. Since then there had been rumours but
no hard evidence that the animal still existed in Angola. When the scientists
confirmed that the DNA found in the dung they had collected matched the DNA of
a giant sable they set up cameras to gather more direct evidence. These
captured images of the giant sables regularly visiting parts of the Luando
Integral Nature Reserve and the Cangandala National Park. One female pictured
was clearly pregnant.